NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 6GB VRAM Quadro 7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 163.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+166%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 7000
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
851 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
163.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.23 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
204W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
