Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 24GB VRAM L40 CNX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA L40 CNX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 221% (2475MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
L40 CNX +2432%
89.97 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
142
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
18176
192
TMUs
568
48
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
475.2 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1406 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.97 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.97 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1406 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-???-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy