Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1480MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +27%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP106
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy