Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (924MHz vs 784MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +11%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM204
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy