Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +3471%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
32
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G84
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
42W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy