Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA A10G

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 118% (1710MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
7872 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
A10G +1395%
31.52 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4200
176
A10G +1981%
3664
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1320 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
9216
112
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA102
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy