NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
GRID K280Q
+8%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
