NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM Tesla T10 Processor to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 188W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
+238%
2.107 TFLOPS
Tesla T10 Processor
0.622 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K4200
32
Tesla T10 Processor
+487%
188
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1344
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
188W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
