NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+430%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
DG2-128
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
