NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+292%
2.957 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K3000M
495
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+492%
2934
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
576
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU117B
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
