NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1342%
8.253 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
30
RTX A2000 Embedded
+6570%
2001
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
RTX A2000 Embedded
+2158%
271
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA107S
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
