NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A
+743%
4.825 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GM204
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
