NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+444%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
51W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
DG2-128
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
