Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1252MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +14%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1228 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1252 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
256
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.03 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.03 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.02 GFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
641.0 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.03 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GP107-825-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy