NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000
+833%
6.844 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GM200
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
