NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40st
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40st to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40st 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Tesla K40st
+1340%
3.312 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2880
24
TMUs
240
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
96 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.50 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.312 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1104 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
245W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GK110B
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
