NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
+930%
2.369 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GK104
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
