NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
16192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+11248%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
16384
64
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
2400W
300 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
100 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
