NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+4709%
22.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
448
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
100 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
