NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID K1
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GRID K1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
GRID K1
+386%
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
