NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+24959%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
42W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
