Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID K100

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID K100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM GRID K100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (42W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
GRID K100 +386%
0.326 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net