NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1598%
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
20
256
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
Unknown
529 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
