NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
16192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+12324%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
16384
32
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
2400W
-
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N12P-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
100 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
