Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro W8100

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +144%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2014
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
512bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
40
3584
Shading Units
2560
224
TMUs
160
96
ROPs
64
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy