NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs Intel Arc A770M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 16GB VRAM Arc A770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)
Intel Arc A770M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Arc A770M
+5533%
13.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
NVS Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
211.2 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
422.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.03 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
DG2-512
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
