NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 965M
+881%
2.355 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2016
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
935 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.80 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.355 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
GM206S
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
N16E-GR-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
