Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition

NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 122W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition +820%
2.209 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2012
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.01 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.03 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.209 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.03 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
122W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF117
GPU Name
GK104
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX2-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net