Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S10 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

Moore Threads MTT S10 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM MTT S10 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S10 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S10
2.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 +39%
2.849 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Apr 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
TU117
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net