Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs Intel Arc A310

Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +478%
15.56 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2022
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
32
256
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
22 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net