Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+475%
15.56 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
24
256
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
22 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
