Matrox Millenium P650 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM Millenium P650 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 20 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 7.360GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2003
Release Date
Feb 2024
Parhelia
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
230 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
64MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
7.360GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
-
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
88
2
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
460.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
1.840 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Parhelia-LX
GPU Name
AD107
MP-A4L
GPU Variant
-
Parhelia
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
150 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.08 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
130 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
8.1
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.7
