NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 155% (2350MHz vs 921MHz)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Nano GPU
0.236 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+1939%
4.813 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2025
Tegra
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
640 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
921 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
128
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
14.74 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
471.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
235.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
7.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GM20B
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
TM660M-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
20 nm
Process Size
3 nm
2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
5.3
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
