Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8250 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 175% (1100MHz vs 400MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (8W vs 15W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU +1556%
1.69 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8250 IGP
0.102 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2020
Release Date
May 2013
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Temash
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
128
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
3.379 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.690 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
102.4 GFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.400 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
Kalindi
-
GPU Variant
Kalindi LP
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.178 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
110 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
8W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy