Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1550MHz vs 1500MHz)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 9100 +416%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jul 2017
H3C Graphics
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
12.5 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
230W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy