Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (1550MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +25%
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Feb 2014
H3C Graphics
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
16
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.8 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy