Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (1550MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 900 +43%
3.405 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2020
Radeon Sky
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG1
Orthrus
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy