Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+140%
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Apr 2017
H3C Graphics
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.7 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
