Intel H3C XG310 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
Lower TDP (300W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+932%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Unknown
H3C Graphics
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
8192
48
TMUs
512
24
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
450W
700 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
22 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
