Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+5191%
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Aug 2008
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
G96C
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.314 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
