Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+1553%
2.381 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jun 2007
H3C Graphics
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
73W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.39 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
