Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro D500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (274W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+6%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jan 2014
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
3GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
24
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
96
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
274W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.313 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
