Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1550MHz vs 1410MHz)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+430%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Sep 2021
H3C Graphics
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
70
768
Shading Units
4480
48
TMUs
280
24
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
54.2 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
