Home GPU Comparison H200 SXM vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

H200 SXM vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

AI GPU We compared a GPU: 141GB VRAM H200 SXM and a Professional market GPU: 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

H200 SXM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1980MHz vs 1530MHz)
More VRAM (141GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4800GB/s vs 897.0GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 700W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H200 SXM +327%
67 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Mar 2018
Hopper
Generation
Tesla
AI GPU
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1590 MHz
Base Clock
1290 MHz
1980 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

141GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
HBM2
5120bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
4800GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

132
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
16896
Shading Units
5120
528
TMUs
320
24
ROPs
128
528
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
50 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
1045 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
1979 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
34 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GH200
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
-
Hopper
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
12 nm
80 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
814 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

700W
TDP
250W
1100 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
7.0
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy