Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA H100 CNX vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA H100 CNX vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

AI GPU We compared a GPU: 80GB VRAM H100 CNX and a Professional market GPU: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA H100 CNX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1845MHz vs 1700MHz)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (350W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
More VRAM (128GB vs 80GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 2039GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H100 CNX +18%
53.84 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2021
Tesla Hopper
Generation
Radeon Instinct
AI GPU
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

690 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1845 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1593 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
5120bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
2039GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

114
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
208
14592
Shading Units
13312
456
TMUs
832
24
ROPs
0
456
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
50 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

44.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
841.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
215.4 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
53.84 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
26.92 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GH100
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Hopper
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
6 nm
80 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
814 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

350W
TDP
500W
750 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy