NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1395MHz vs 1098MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
+611%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Dec 2015
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
640
224
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GM107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
