NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1395MHz vs 1163MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
+459%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Apr 2016
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GM206
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
