NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
9.999 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
+10%
11.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jan 2021
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
6144
224
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
350W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
8 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
