NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
+336%
9.999 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jun 2013
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1536
224
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
