Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +2190%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
GRID
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
16384
128
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
100 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
2400W
550 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy